This Government is particularly responsive to the consumer culture,
something that shopkeepers have known about since shops first opened - if you don't give
customers what they want then they don't come.
Some mental health services are forced upon people and they do not have
any choice in what they receive. However, where this is not the case (and perhaps even
more so where it is) then it is a good idea to ask people what kind of service they would
like and what would best meet their needs.
For a long time day services opened during office hours, 9 - 5 Monday
to Friday. This did not meet the needs of the users of those services.
Moves have been made to provide services at the weekends and this is
much appreciated, but this is not the general position and is mainly in the voluntary
sector. If this is what service-users want and need, then why is it not happening within
the statutory sector too? Perhaps the problem is, as so often, the terminology. If you
call them 'day services' then those running and staffing them expect them to open in what
they consider the day. But they are not there just for the convenience of those running
and staffing them, they are there to meet a need. If that need is outside the hours of 9
to 5, then they should start responding to it.
Where Are The Advocates
The White Paper on Reforming The Mental Health Act and the NHS
Plan have talked a great deal about advocacy. Users of the mental health services have
been asking for it for a very long time.
It seems then that everyone agrees that it is a good idea and will
provide a necessary service. The problem is that there are not enough advocates around and
there are no training courses that produce advocates with a certificate that allows them
and those using them to know that they are qualified and competent.
Camden now has in-patient advocacy provision at The Huntley Centre and The Royal Free
Hospital. That is very important, but it is not enough. There are some very good training
institutions within Camden and it would be valuable if they could provide some courses and
qualification in advocacy.
CMHC is very pleased to learn that the North and South
Camden User Forums have been funded for a further year. These regular meetings in the two
localities are the foundation of user meeting within the Borough and under some new plans
they may be the routes into a new Borough Forum, which would be the centre-point for user
involvement.
CMHC would also like to thank our member John Wetherell for his
donation.
Crisis House Research
In response to the 'Real Work for Real Pay' advert, five
Development Workers were recruited. Ian, Lisa, Paul, Oriana and Tabitha are now engaged in
designing the questionnaire and finding respondents in order to produce a report on the
views of Camden service users about what kind of crisis house they would like to see
developed.
Commissioning work in this way may be one of the new roles which CMHC
takes on more often in the future. We will provide the facilities and support and pay the
workers.
Review of User Event
On 29th November last year, the first Camden user
event was held and a number of people came along to be part of that afternoon and
contribute their views. On the day, it was promised that the main themes of the event
would be established and another time would be set when these could be discussed further
and the possible ways forward looked at. This will happen on the afternoon of Tuesday, 27
March at Hampstead Town Hall when after lunch people will be invited to consider the main
points and look at some possible ideas for developing them into an action plan.
This will be followed by a debate on the White Paper proposals to
Reform the Mental Health Act. Dr Trevor Turner, who is a community psychiatrist in East
London will speak in favour of the new proposals, and Dr George Szmukler who has some
original ideas on mental health law will speak against them. Once the two speakers have
made their points, there will be an opportunity for views and questions from everyone
else. There are important changes proposed, including the introduction of Community
Treatment Orders. This will be an opportunity to hear what they mean and to have your say
about them with the possibility of sending the views of the day to our elected
representatives.
Jobs in Mind
Ben Anthony, the Volunteer Co-ordinator at Jobs in Mind is
looking for a service user to talk on Thursday, 5 April at 7.30 pm to the Mental Health
Awareness Course that they run. Anyone interested should contact Ben on 0207 482 8185.
Mind in Camden
Mind in Camden has a new Director, Brian Dawn, and he has
promised to write something about how he sees MiC going forward for a future edition of
The Camden Bugle.
Mind in Camden will be holding its AGM at Barnes House on Wednesday, 28
February.
New Directions Camden - Change to Opening Times
New Directions Camden's contract to run the day centres at
Crossfields and Jamestown has been continued for a further three years. At the Camden
Social Services Committee Meeting which agreed the new contract, Cllr Janet Guthrie raised
the question of the possibility of changing the opening hours to suit service users
better, and the Committee was told that this could be part of the discussion around the
new Service Specification.
This matter has been raised twice in the Bugle's 'In My View' column by
users of the NDC service and has come up regularly at meetings in the Borough. NDC's
Executive Director, Tulloch Kempe, now writes to explain the organisation's position:
"I am writing to the Bugle as I feel it is important to clarify a
number of points raised under 'In My View' in the January edition (Issue 41).
New Directions Camden (NDC), as a mental-health provider, manages the
Crossfield and Jamestown Centres and is widely recognised as an active promoter of
service-user involvement through its well established and developed Service User Forum and
service-user structures.
In the November NDC Forum meeting, a service-user raised the issue of
changing the current Centre opening times. The NDC User Forum decided to undertake a
survey to ascertain NDC service users' views on the subject. It was agreed that if any
changes to opening times were proposed, it would be suggested by the Forum that they were
considered as part of NDC's new Service Specification, due to be reviewed for April 2001.
In subsequent discussions, I also explained that nay proposal would first of all have to
go through a consultation process with staff members involved and also go to NDC's Board.
Following this consultation, any decision to change current opening times would finally
need to be passed by Camden Social Services before any implementation might be possible.
As stated, NDC is highly committed to service-user involvement and to
responding to service user needs wherever possible. We have however, a responsibility also
to go through the correct process of consultation with all of those concerned. I have
consulted on this response with NDC Service User Representatives and hope that this
provides some clarification on the subject."
| C.M.H.C. South Camden User Forum |
The new Crisis Response and Resolution Team (CRRT) is the latest development in South
Camden and the January South Camden User Forum discussed the type of user involvement that
there should be with the new team. There had always been an idea that there should be a
service user as a part of the actual team but there had not been enough money to achieve
this on a permanent basis even part time. The solution for the time being is to establish
a reference group to which the team will regularly report and there were volunteers from
SCUF to be part of this group. The CRRT is expected to begin its task at the end of
February and it is hoped that the Reference Group will be established by then.
For the first half of the year at least, SCUF has a fixed date, time and base: 5.30 -
7.30 pm on the last Tuesday of the month at Jules Thorn Day Hospital. This and the fact
that it is to continue being funded for a further year provides an opportunity to develop
it further.
The meeting on Tuesday, 27 February, will have Saimo Chahal, a local solicitor, talking
about the Mental Health Act and the Human Rights Act. Interesting and relevant subjects in
themselves, it will also lay the groundwork for the debate on the proposals to reform the
MHA at Hampstead Town Hall on 27th March.
The Meeting on 27 March would clash with the normal SCUF for that month and so we have
decided that it would not be possible to hold that meeting and the next SCUF will be in
April on Tuesday 26th, when Kate Crosby - an advocate who works within an NHS
setting and a long-time member of CMHC, will come to talk about her work and her book on
advocacy 'Power Tools'.
In May, SCUF will hear from Andy Mattin, the Director of the North London Forensic
Service and one of his medical colleagues, about the work of that service and how it deals
with detained patients who are held in secure conditions. This is another opportunity -
Andy came to the February meeting of the North Camden user Forum - to hear about this
subject.
| C.M.H.C.
North Camden User Forum |
The February meeting of the North Camden User Forum was opened by Keith
Russell talking about the proposals to set up Patients' Councils in the in-patient wards
and day hospitals at the RFH. There was a discussion about what they would do and how they
would be constructed, but the proposal was generally well received. The working group is
still drawing up the plans but it is hoped that they will be ready by the end of March,
and Keith has promised to come back to the April meeting with a full proposal.
During the discussion on the Patients' Councils, there was a wider
thread of user involvement and the matter of opening hours at the NDC Jamestown and
Crossfields Centres came up again. The possibility of two members of the NCUF attending
the North Camden Locality Management Advisory Group attracted comment but no volunteers.
Perhaps we need to prepare a clear description of what the role entails and how people
will be supported. These points can be taken up when the LMAG meets on March 9th.
The secure psychiatric services are quite small in proportion of the
whole, but they tend to attract more than their share of comment often because of the
nature of the patients they look after, people who have usually been in trouble with the
criminal law and sometimes very seriously.
In this area, most of the secure provision is under the control of the
North London Forensic Service and Andy Mattin is its Director. Andy used to be the
Assistant General Manager of Mental Health Services at the RFH and he was interested to
see how user involvement has developed since he left. In his own service, he recognised
that there was little real opportunity for patients to have a great say in things and that
the provisions of the NHS Plan, which apply equally to the unit that he manages at Chase
Farm, present a real challenge to implement. Andy came to the NCUF to talk about the high
security services, which run from the Special Hospitals to specialist hostel
accommodation. It is a very interesting and little understood area which costs large sums
of money and often makes headlines for the wrong reasons. In the end, it is caring for
patients with high needs and probably for a long period of time.
The March NCUF will bring back a local solicitor, Louise Coubrough, who specialises in
mental health work. She is coming to talk about the Mental Health Act and The Human Rights
Act. While people are sure to have questions about 'sectioning' and Mental Health Act
Review Tribunals, we hope that it will also provide some background for the White Paper
Debate on Tuesday, 27 March, when people will have the opportunity to listen to what the
government proposes and possibly still take some steps to change it - it is an election
year!
WHITE PAPER
'REFORMING THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT'
|
There has been talk of major reforms to the 1983 Mental Health Act for
some time, and there has been disagreement among those involved about what should or
should not be in any new act.
In late December, a White Paper on Reforming The Mental Health Act was
introduced in Parliament. A summary was sent to all CMHC Members earlier this month. It is
a two-part document, the larger second part about 'safety'. The latter part of the
afternoon of Tuesday, 27 March, 3.00 - 4.30 pm, will be given over to a debate and
discussion on the subject when Dr Trevor Turner, who is a community psychiatrist in East
London, will support the proposals and Dr George Szmukler will oppose them.
Peter Campbell is a well-know figure in the user/survivor movement, writing, speaking
and commenting on the mental health services. He was one of the moving forces in the
establishment of CMHC. Here he gives his views on the first part of the White Paper.
"Reforming the Mental Health Act" - Part
One
by
Peter Campbell
My position on a new Mental Health Act is influenced by my belief that
mental health workers do not need greater or more extensive powers and that service users
need more protection and greater control over their care and treatment. From this
standpoint, the White Paper is a mixed bag.
The long struggle against the extension of compulsory powers into community settings
(in which many service user groups have been involved) has clearly been lost. Leaving
those arguments to one side, two issues concern me most - the fact that compulsory
community orders are likely to apply to a much wider group than aftercare under
supervision does, and the implications for service providers and recipients of compulsory
attendance at day centres, employment schemes and counselling sessions. Care and treatment
in the community could become a more restrictive alternative, even if still less
restrictive than detention on an acute ward.
The government wants people with a mental illness diagnosis to be
treated as far as possible like other groups in society. Nevertheless, the clear
distinction remains that people with a mental disorder who retain decision-making capacity
can be detained and treated without their consent. Despite much debate in the last
eighteen months, capacity is unlikely to be a significant criteria when compulsory
interventions are being decided. I believe capacity should have more importance but I also
feel that if any of us were formally judged "detained and incapable", we might
be in an even worse position than detained service users are today. There are one or two
good changes in terms of safeguards. The fact that you will not be detained for more than
28 days without the involvement of an independent tribunal is a significant development.
While the contribution of service users within the tribunal (not currently envisaged)
would be beneficial, the presence of an independent body at the start of any proposed
long-term detention is very welcome.
Responses during the consultation process have moved the government
position on advocacy from cold to something a little beyond lukewarm. Although I feel too
much is often claimed for advocacy, which may do more to improve processes than to change
outcomes, it does offer service users the chance of greater influence. The recognition of
advocacy in a new Mental Health Act may lead to all sorts of battles about the nature of
advocacy and the ownership of advocacy, but it would still be a good step in the right
direction.
Even so, the White Paper comes down on the side of clinical authority
too often. Any controls on prescribing practice will only be in the Code of Practice (not
statutory). Instead of advance directives indicating what we think is in our best
interests, we will be encouraged into advance agreements where our best interests are
agreed with the caring team. Strangest of all - the "nearest relative" will be
replaced by a "nominated person", but the clinical coordinator, not the service
user, will have the final say on who that is.
When it comes to moderating compulsory powers, this White Paper is
moving extremely cautiously. |
| Important
Dates for February / March / April 2001 |
| TUESDAY |
27 February |
CMHC South Camden User Forum |
Saimo Chahal, Solicotor |
will talk about |
The Mental Health Act & The
Human Rights Act |
|
| Time: 5:30 - 7:00 pm |
| Venue: Jules Thorn Day Hospital, St Pancras
Hospital, St Pancras Way, NW1 |
|
| TUESDAY |
6 March |
CMHC North Camden User Forum |
Louise Coubrough, Solicitor |
will talk about |
The Mental Health Act & The
Human Rights Act |
| Time: 4:30 - 6:00 pm |
| Venue: Room 20, Psychotherapy Corridor, 2nd Floor,
Tower Block, RFH |
|
TUESDAY, 27 MARCH 2001
12:00 - 4:30 p.m.
Hamstead Town Hall, Belsize Park, NW3
USER DAY REVIEW
&
MHA WHITE PAPER REFORMS DEBATE |
| TUESDAY |
3 April |
CMHC North Camden User Forum |
| Time: 4:30 - 6:00 pm |
| Venue: Room 20, Psychotherapy Corridor, 2nd Floor,
Tower Block, RFH |
|
|